comparing+and+contrasting

media type="file" key="PROPOSITOS.wma"  ** In the same way that the architect brings to the society the possibility to distinguish the difference between the sites and the role of each one through the different design of the buildings, the planner creates a differentiation in regard to areas of use the city. **
 *  The purpose of the town planner is to maximize the efficiency of land use and infrastructure of a community, while the architect seeks to relate the function of a building with the form which this will have, the planner also look for this connection through an analysis but this relates to land use, ie the territorial space. **
 * The architect and city planner have in common that they are responsible for studying the climatic factors, socio-economic and territorial before doing any design.

In opposition to the planner, the architect focuses more on the shape of the building and its immediate context, and the planner must consider the entire context and is not concerned about the exact shape of the structures.

From the point of view of urbanism, Caracas has huge problems in terms of mobility, because the communication channels have become inefficient and do not permit a proper flow within the city, on the other hand, there are not enough studies and not the necessary ordinances for the improvement of the whole city. No it provides security for the population.

From the viewpoint of architecture, structures are not suitable to the climate of the country; Caracas has not evaluated the impact that a building can have on people. **